BUS 670 Week 2 Discussion 2

BUS 670 Week 2 Discussion 2

After viewing the Chinese Imports & Food Safety (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. video, consider whether U.S. retailers that utilize products or raw ingredients that are imported from China and are poorly regulated should be liable in tort for injuries to consumers who are harmed by those products. Answer parts a and b of the prompt.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on BUS 670 Week 2 Discussion 2 completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

  1. For this part of the prompt, answer one of the      following points: 
    • If U.S. companies should not be liable, then they       could be legally exempt from tort liability. Discuss the consequences of       such a policy to U.S. consumers.
    • If the U.S. companies should be liable, then those       companies would not be legally exempt from tort liability. Discuss the       consequences of such a policy to U.S. businesses.
  2. Regardless of your response to part a, assume that U.S.      retailers do have legal liability for defective products. What steps could      U.S. retailers and manufacturers take when using products imported from      China that would minimize their liability exposure? For example, they      could warn consumers about the potential, though speculative, dangers when      using products comprised of poorly regulated ingredients or components.      Given your strategy, what challenges would exist for U.S. businesses that      implemented your strategy?

Guided Response: Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts in a substantive manner. Some ways to do this include the following, though you may choose a different approach, providing your response is substantive:

Discuss the challenges that would exist if your employer (or a fictitious employer) were to adopt your classmate’s strategy. 

Order Solution Now

Similar Posts