RTI and EBP strategies in ABA

In this discussion you will present two effective RTI (Response-to-Intervention) and/or EBP (Evidence-based-practices) strategies. You can do 2 of EBP or RTI or 2 of either one of the topics.  Your discussion should reflect best practice as found in the literature and not a personal preference. Your posts do not have to be long but complete enough that others can understand the intervention or strategy and how it is used. Cite the literature you reviewed supporting your position.

RTI and EBP cover a lot of territory. Obviously, you could not cover the entire area of responses in these topics so focus your posts on a specific element(s) of RTI or EBP such as the state of the literature in these topics, issues and problems with some element of RTI or EBP or issues with implementation of RTI or EBP. Please free to focus on any elements of EBP or RtI that you find interesting.

They check for AI & Plagiarism

General Rubric For All Assignments

This rubric will be used in evaluating the quality of your discussion contributions and written assignments. Numeric values are not assigned to the categories as they change according to the value of the assignment. I want to see well thought out and referenced ideas, not opinion based on experience. Experience is a wonderful thing, but in this course we will stick to researched facts from your text and peer-reviewed articles.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on RTI and EBP strategies in ABA completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Criteria

Ratings

Grasp of readings

Excellent

Writing represents researched perspective, evidence and conclusions accurately, fairly, and eloquently; Demonstrates a firm understanding of the implications of researched arguments.

Good

Writing represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions accurately but with little detail.

Developing

Writing mostly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and conclusions though not clearly and/or there are minor inaccuracies. Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Writing poorly represents the researched perspective, evidence, and/or conclusions. Mostly opinion.

Critical analysis

Excellent

Presents a clear, focused, and compelling position. Recognizes and presents the complexity of the issue.

Good

Position/opinions articulated well but needs more support and refining.

Developing

Analysis and thought are limited. Lacks support from research. Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Vague and general comments. Mostly opinion.

Evidence

Excellent

Evidence is cited, detailed, and well-chosen. Evidence is clearly articulated.

Good

Evidence is well chosen but not well articulated, is not particularly presented and not clearly substantiated.

Developing

Evidence is weak and lacking in detail.

Some opinion.

Needs Improvement

Evidence does not support ideas. Mostly opinion.

Organization & Clarity

Excellent

Thoughts flow logically with good transitions, including supported research.

Good

Thoughts are mostly well-structured and mostly presented clearly.

Developing

Jumps from one idea to another without structure, transitions or connections.

Needs Improvement

Thoughts are not presented logically. Mostly opinion.

Mechanics

Excellent

When applicable, thoughts/paper is appropriately organized using APA format throughout. There are no incomplete or run on sentences. No spelling or grammar issues.

Good

Thoughts/paper is appropriately organized with only minor grammatical issues.

Developing

There are many formatting, spelling and grammar issues.

Needs Improvement

Unacceptable. There are incomplete and/or run-on sentence(s). Thoughts are characterized by spelling and grammar errors.

Order Solution Now

Similar Posts