NR714 Week 5 Assignment Systematic and Integrative Review Latest November 2018

NR714 Application of Analytic Methods II

Week 5 Assignment

Systematic and Integrative Review

of Selected Practice Query

Guidelines

The purpose of this application is to provide the student an opportunity to develop a systematic and integrative

review of selected practice query.

COURSE OUTCOMES

This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following Course Outcomes:

CO 1: Formulate PICOT/PICoT questions relevant to advanced nursing practice (PO #3).

CO 2: Utilize comprehensive systematic-review skills necessary for evidence-based practice (PO #5).

CO 3: Critically appraise level and quality of evidence related to a selected advanced nursing practice

issue (PO #3).

CO 5: Evaluate appropriateness of a qualitative research design for a selected PICoT question (PO #3).

CO 6: Evaluate appropriateness of a quantitative research design for a selected PICOT question (PO #3).

CO 7: Evaluate appropriateness of an economic research design for a selected economic appraisal of

evidence (PO #3).

CO 9: Analyze qualitative, quantitative, and economic data for the purposes of critical appraisal of

evidence (PO #3).

CO 10: Evaluate selected statistical methods for the purposes of critical appraisal of evidence (PO #5).

POINTS

This assignment is worth a total of 265 points.

DUE DATE

Submit your completed assignment by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5, as directed.

REQUIREMENTS

1. To complete this application, you will want to access all available scientific search engines. There are numerous robust scientific search engines to retrieve relevant research to support your clinical problem and clinical question (PICOT). The link to our library home is http://library.chamberlain.edu with a link for research help in the Ask A Librarian box http://chamberlain.libanswers.com/ask

2. The Systematic and Integrative Review of Selected Practice Query paper is worth 250 points and will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.

3. Create your report using Microsoft Word (a part of Microsoft Office), which is the required format for all Chamberlain College of Nursing documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a Microsoft Word document because it will end in .docx.

4. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this project may be posted under the Q & A forum.

5. The length of the project report is to be no less than 6 and no greater than 8 pages excluding title page and reference pages.

6. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface):

Note: Introduction—Write an introduction to the systematic and integrative review of selected practice query, but do not use Introduction as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered):

a. Description of systematic and integrative review of selected practice query (both integrative and systematic review of evidence)

b. Presentation of systematic and integrative review of selected practice query analysis including quantitative, qualitative, and economic evidence

PREPARING THE PROJECT REPORT

The following are best practices for preparing this project report:

1. When introducing the systematic and integrative review of selected practice query, be sure to include

pertinent background information regarding the topic (who, what, where, when, and why).

2. When describing the selected practice query, be sure to fully identify and address evidence using a

synthesis (integrative review citing areas of agreement and disagreement among authors) approach for

the written summary and embed or attach the evidence table (systematic review citing leveling and

grading of evidence) using the template found in Course Resources.

3. When presenting the systematic and integrative review of selected practice query analysis, be sure to

fully incorporate evidence from quantitative, qualitative, and economic sources